Six seminars on the security questions that land on the table first when a company puts AI to work: who approved this agent. What may it do, what not. Who revokes that. And what do you produce when someone asks.
The work happens on running systems, not on slides. GARION, AZARION, ZERYON Control Studio and AXYON are in the room as working material — anyone who picks a different tool afterwards has still understood the method.
In-house seminar day €2,900 net · open online seminar €890 net per participantInternal audit wants to know who approved the agent that placed an order last week. A customer in your supply chain sends a questionnaire and asks for the list of your AI systems, with an owner on every line. The insurer asks about the procedure that stops an automated action. None of the three want an assessment. They want evidence.
Whoever stands there does not need another overview talk about generative AI. They need to know which questions get asked, what makes an answer hold up, and how the evidence for it is produced in their own building. That is what these seminars are about, and nothing else.
Each seminar runs a day and stands on its own. Two or three can be combined into a series when the same group is meant to walk the whole way from classification to evidence.
Where AI systems are exposed and where they leak: instructions smuggled into documents and web content, outflow via model providers, shadow AI in business units, tool permissions that reach further than anyone assumed. We walk the attack surface on a real setup and record which of those points are open at your place.
An agent gets a task, a bounded scope and an approval level — and somebody must be able to stop it. We work through the chain: its own technical identity, permissions per action, four-eyes approval, escalation, revocation, emergency stop. Afterwards you know why an available tool is not the same thing as an authorised action.
What do you put in front of an auditor, and how does she tell that nothing was adjusted afterwards. We look at how an append-only, chained log is built, how a third party recomputes it, and which gaps open up when logs live only in memory or can be overwritten at will.
Which requirements apply follows from the use case, not from the tool. So we practise the determination: describe the use case, settle the role, place the risk, derive what has to be evidenced. You leave with a filled-in inventory of your own systems. This is explicitly not legal advice.
Your suppliers use AI, and you carry part of the outcome. We go through what can reasonably be demanded from a third party, how to make the answers comparable instead of merely filing them, and how to spot a questionnaire that came out of marketing rather than out of operations.
What stays in the building, what leaves it, and what the decision costs. We look at what local models manage today, where they fall short, which hardware it takes, and what a setup looks like in which confidential material never leaves the device. Without promising that local automatically means safe.
In-house is the normal case, because the material is then worked through on your own systems. The open online seminar is the route for individuals who do not want to wait for a group to form internally.
One day with your group. The examples come from your operation, not from a sample company. Beforehand we spend 30 minutes on your situation so the day does not start from zero.
A full day over Zoom, with participants from different companies. The examples are generic then, the method is the same. The group stays small so that questions still have room.
There is no fixed annual calendar for the open seminars. A date is set as soon as enough people have registered interest in a topic — usually within a few weeks. Use the form below to say which seminar you want; you get the date in writing before anything becomes binding.
All prices net plus VAT. No subscription, no per-head fee in the in-house format, no additional invoice after the day.
You know before you commit what the day contains and what it costs.
Give us the number of the seminar, whether in-house or open, and how many people it concerns. You get a proposed date and the terms in writing before anything becomes binding. If a call is quicker, call.